![]() ![]() Heck, they’re both coming off first halves that stayed a lot closer than people expected. They’re both highly rated in every major computer metric. In many ways, these resumes are near mirror images of each other. The discussion will include both teams’ entire bodies of work. The CFP committee isn’t just going to look at this week’s results. Last season, the Buckeyes led Nebraska by only six points with five minutes to go, despite being favored by 14 points. It went on to win the Big Ten and finish 13-1. In 2018, Ohio State needed a two-point conversion stop to beat Maryland in overtime as a massive favorite. I understand that Ohio State didn’t look impressive against Northwestern, but outlier bad games around this time have never been very predictive of future Buckeye results. Not to mention the Wolverines have yet to trail or be tied against an opponent in the fourth quarter all season, which is why they should be ranked No. They should be able to score on all facets, not just through the air. In perfect conditions, they will run any team off the field, but if they can’t play a grind-it-out game, then they’ll be in some trouble on Nov. Not that a high-powered team continued to pass the ball instead of just enforcing their will on an inferior team and pounding the ball down their throats. ![]() The Buckeyes struggled against one-win Northwestern due to wind conditions. Ohio State, on the other hand, after facing some recent adversity, blamed their poor showing against Northwestern on weather conditions, like they don’t play in the East Division of the Big Ten. Michigan went on a 21-0 run in the second half against Indiana to pull away with the victory, and if you’re keeping score, Michigan has outscored its opponents in second halves of the last four matchups 100-3. ![]() They eventually ended the game on a 38-0 run, boat-racing the Scarlett Knights in a 52-17 victory.Īgainst MSU, after trailing 7-3 in the first quarter, the men in maize went on a 26-0 run to end the game, with 16 points coming in the second half.Īgainst Penn State, the Wolverines, while finishing the second half on a 25-3 run, rushed for over 400 yards. The Wolverines trailed at the half to an unranked Rutgers team and flipped the switch by turning a 17-14 deficit into a 35-17 lead in the opening two minutes of the third quarter. This past Saturday, Michigan, after a hard-fought in-state battle against the Spartans, had to take its show on the road and not only battle but overcome adversity in front of a raucous crowd under the lights. Production from the quarterback to the running game, the receivers and tight end play, to the tremendous leaps from the no-star defense, it’s like night and day, which is what the CFP likes: recent production. Watching the Michigan Wolverines over these past few weeks has been impressive, as they’ve grown tremendously in all phases of the game. 7 last week, it’s pretty obvious that the second and third slots will belong to Michigan and Ohio State.īut in what order? The argument for Michigan That leaves just four unbeatens in college football, and since the committee ranked TCU all the way down at No. 4 team, got boat raced by a three-loss team. 1 Tennessee in dominant fashion over the weekend, emphatically earning this week’s top spot. But will it be Michigan or Ohio State at No. – When the second edition of this year’s College Football Playoff rankings is released, everyone knows who will be at the top. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |